I’ve politically lost contact with almost all of my past connections since supporting Ukraine in its struggle for survival. I'm a tiny girl, but I was still a nuisance to some (who aren't quite that big either) at the time of separation.
As a now politically homeless, I have learned that renouncing doctrines of any kind and seeking self-determined sense of justice is often answered with reluctance, misunderstanding and contempt. Thus, not a few with whom I engage in Ukraine's just war support Israel's unjust war against the Palestinian civilian population, although it is no longer about "self-defense".
So I ask myself: why do those who are blind in one eye react similar to those who are blinded in one eye? There are also doctrines that are misunderstood as political positions at stake.
So, I'm already down with my foreign policy stance expressed in such a way: in the case of my deployment to Ukraine, it was considered "pro-NATO" and in the case of criticism of the far exaggerated and ultimately external military Israeli reaction as "anti-Semitic".
Given that, it is rather of little interest that I still take a professional, pro-union and social redistribution (which is a word from the last millennium - some would say) and on matters of immigration, certainly not in the chorus of the weepers. in one accord.
But it's a fact: Fascism comes from several sides - from the inside and out - and not on quiet, but also on sometimes suspicious squeaky soles. But many (which is not the case here), but especially those who worship their different doctrines, do not want to see this, because these doctrines comfort and help to blend out different external and internal enemies of democracy and coexistence. These doctrines are all from the 20th. Century, either from 1917ff. in Soviet Russia - an unfulfilled (Alp) dream purchased with millions of human sacrifices - or a completely understandable psychological transfer of the justly perceived own historical guilt on the critical support of the actions of the respective Israeli government - although between which to the last le running jitzchak Rabbi and indicted Mr Netanyahu are truly worlds ( worlds! ) lie down.
It is not only, but also anti-German and anti-imperialist shadows of progressive thinking that have made the left - to which parties and shadows are always divided - dwarf.
You can, of course, ignore the throwing of the questions I asked as platonic-idealistic and continue to focus only on appealing from the voters in strenuous basic work - for example, following the motto I consider as anti-discourse: "Help instead of talking! "I would add this as another objection that as part of a left, you also become unbelievable when you practically rely only on elections and therefore on domestic voters. On the other hand, these tend often to the far right because they - among other things, after corresponding indoctrination by the media cut to them - do not want to have anything to do with the only partially integrated, immigrant and non-electable part of the working class they belong to - not only because this part as on the The labor market is perceived as pushing wages, but also for reasons of a racism that is easily provoked by them.
We live in a time of defending fascism and the ridicule of the international law founded against the fascism defeated in 1945. The progressive demands, if they are not to puff up, but to be incorporated into a comprehensive alliance against fascism, must therefore be moderate (social democratic reform oriented). All facts from the previous history since the mid 19th century. This is what the century indicates: The Left, which wants more than just cosmetic corrections to the political-economic system, will never achieve a political majority - and if, only in emergency situations and only for a short period of time, would therefore be forced to take dictatorial measures once she is in power (see 1917). Therefore, progressive demands in favour of the overadvantaged and the exploited are no less appropriate. They can only be reached in a smart way but only in the opposite association with liberals or conservatives in the joint fight against fascism.